Whereas 4. A study in five African countries found that the performance of point-of-care tests was sub-optimal. Samples from some countries were more likely to have false positive results than others, suggesting that tests need to be locally validated and that some tests may be more accurate in relation to some HIV subtypes than others. The researchers found a high number of false positive results, whereas false negative results were relatively rare.
The findings confirm that the diagnosis of HIV should not be based on results from a single HIV rapid diagnostic test. A combination of HIV tests, and more specifically an algorithm sequence of two or three different tests, is required to make an HIV-positive diagnosis.
This is recommended in testing guidelines. All HIV tests need to have reactive preliminary positive results confirmed with confirmatory tests. A particular challenge healthcare workers have with rapid tests is how to communicate a reactive result to the person testing who may be present while the result is being read and explain that supplementary tests are needed. These problems are less frequently faced with laboratory testing — a large enough blood sample was taken to allow for it to be tested several times and for uncertainties in the diagnosis to be resolved.
The window period refers to the time after infection and before seroconversion, during which markers of infection p24 antigen and antibodies are still absent or too scarce to be detectable. Tests cannot reliably detect HIV infection until after the window period has passed. All tests have a window period, which varies from test to test. Delaney and colleagues estimated window periods for a handful of rapid tests in a study. However, all these estimates were based on testing blood plasma.
In practice, tests are usually done on fingerprick blood obtained by pricking the finger with a lancet and the window period is likely to be several days longer. This indicates that half of all infections would be detected between 15 and 25 days after exposure. Ninety-nine per cent of HIV-infected individuals would be detectable within 43 days of exposure. This indicates that half of all infections would be detected between 22 and 31 days after exposure.
Ninety-nine per cent of HIV-infected individuals would be detectable within 50 days of exposure. The median window period was 31 days interquartile range 26 to 37 days. This indicates that half of all infections would be detected between 26 and 37 days after exposure. Ninety-nine per cent of HIV-infected individuals would be detectable within 57 days of exposure.
This requires a blood sample, taken through a needle from a vein in the arm, which is tested in a laboratory using a more sensitive test. The results should be available after a few days. The test did not find any evidence of HIV infection. The test assay has reacted to a substance in your blood. Many Federal agencies have developed public awareness and education campaigns to address HIV prevention, treatment, care, and research. Also included is information about campaigns related to the prevention and diagnosis of hepatitis B and C.
El VIH es una amenaza de salud grave para las comunidades latinas, quienes se encuentran en gran desventaja respecto de la incidencia de esta enfermedad en los Estados Unidos. Want to stay abreast of changes in prevention, care, treatment or research or other public health arenas that affect our collective response to the HIV epidemic?
Or are you new to this field? Menu HIV. GOV Search Search. Where to Get Tested? Was this page helpful? An estimated 1. For people with undiagnosed HIV, testing is the first step in maintaining a healthy life and preventing HIV transmission. The recommendations also call for reducing barriers to HIV testing. In April , the U. Preventive Services Task Force external icon issued similar guidance. CDC recommends that everyone between the ages of 13 and 64 get tested for HIV at least once as part of routine health care.
For those at higher risk , CDC recommends getting tested at least once a year. Data external icon from a clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health show a clear personal health advantage to being diagnosed with HIV early and starting treatment right away. This information further highlights the importance of routine HIV testing and its potential impact on better health outcomes.
Studies show that the sooner people start treatment after diagnosis, the more they benefit from ART. HIV tests are very accurate, but no test can detect the virus immediately after infection. How soon a test can detect HIV depends upon different factors, including the type of test being used. HIV Testing Topics.
Other Resources. Get tailored information about your risk and learn how to protect yourself. Top of Page. More HIV Topics. Follow HIV.
0コメント