However, the wound would have healed weeks earlier, so Van Gogh would presumably not have been bandaged. In his reference to the headband and cap it sounds as if Signac is actually recalling the Van Gogh self-portraits with bandaged ear, rather than his encounter. He would also have heard the accounts of the incident from his father, who died in Although these three witnesses remember it as part of the ear, others recall it as the whole ear.
Gauguin had fled to a hotel a few hours before the incident, but returned the following morning, just before the police arranged for Van Gogh to be taken to hospital. A day later Gauguin returned to Paris and quickly spoke with fellow artist Emile Bernard. But when Gauguin very briefly saw the injured Van Gogh in bed the wound would probably have been roughly covered with a sheet, with blood all around and congealed blood on the wound, so it would have been difficult to determine exactly how much of the ear had been lost.
He should be a good witness, since he had dressed the wound; as a doctor he should describe medical conditions precisely; and he had had a friendly relationship with the artist. A interview with the art historian Max Braumann and the artist Julius Seyler hardly inspires confidence. Murphy, based in southern France, reached out to the library. So, where had the story gone wrong? For a long time, the accepted story was that van Gogh gifted the bloody appendage to a woman named Rachel, a prostitute at the brothel van Gogh frequented while living in Arles, in southern France.
Murphy scoured census records from Arles and found no prostitutes named Rachel. Murphy found a woman named Gabrielle, but she was only 18 years old at the time — three years too young to be a registered prostitute. Gaby also worked at a cafe that van Gogh visited regularly, suggesting a closer connection between the pair than was previously believed. Van Gogh believed that 80 people had signed the petition, which upset him gravely. But only 30 people had signed it. Part two of the plan was getting another painter to stay with him and paint.
The previous year, in , Paul Gauguin moved to Paris where he met Vincent. Vincent's brother Theo, an art dealer was representing Gauguin and introduced the two. Vincent respected Gauguin and thought him the perfect painter to join him in Arles. With some convincing from Theo, Gauguin agreed and arrived on October 23rd, meeting Vincent at the door of the yellow house early in the morning. The painters got along well for weeks. They ate together, they drank together, and they painted together.
In the small house they were together almost all of the time. Van Gogh and Gauguin both had an interest in Impressionism and painted the same subjects. They painted side by side, showing how two painters can show the same scene in different ways.
Arles was proving to be a productive place to paint for both artists, but Gauguin was moving away from Impressionism. Van Gogh, on the other hand, was producing some of his finest paintings — ones that would later be shown in the biggest museums in the world. Things didn't stay happy for long. Eventually Gauguin was finding it hard to live with Vincent.
Gauguin felt that they had accomplished a lot, and that his views on art were becoming increasingly different than those of Vincent. This situation was becoming stressful to both men.
0コメント